Posted by
OldFogey43 on Sunday, November 30, 2008 11:35:26 PM
We have been inundunated with massive election-day analysis from the media and internet blogs scrutinizing and dissecting data accumulated by the many survey groups - some of those groups legitimate and some not so legitimate. Is there room for one more analysis or have we reached maximum permissable exposure (the maximum level that a person may be exposed to without adverse biological effects)? This is a close call, so I am going forward with much trepidation.
Most people, even atheistic zealots like Christopher Hitchens, recognize that our country is still a Christian country. Most surveys indicate that approximately 80% of our population identify themselves as Christians, although the expression "Christian" has lost its distinctiveness and clarity over the last forty years. So, how did a candidate, who expresses support for abortion and was a member for twenty years in a church that does not embrace a scriptural belief system, garner 53% of the voting public?
Adults who claimed to be "absolutely committed to Christianity" voted overwhemingly for Senator McCain (59% to 40%). Those who were "moderately committed to Christianity" were overwhelmingly persuaded to back Senator Obama (64% to 35%). People who called themselves Christians but said they were not committed to the faith also sided heavily with Senator Obama (79% to 21%). Protestant voters sided with Senator McCain by a 53% to 46% split. Catholic voting behavior was significantly different than that of Protestants: they backed Senator Obama by a 56% to 43% split. The last group, Born Again Adults, split with 57% voting for Senator McCain and 42% opting for Senator Obama. (Go to the Barna Group for additional data on "People of Faith" voting results)
Looking at that data, as a Christian, I am immediately astounded by these numbers. In addtion, as a California resident I was astounded shocked flabbergasted that 48% of voters wanted to retain same sex marriages. Where was the Christian vote? Or more appropriately, where was the vote that one would expect to be cast and indicative of a group identified as "people of faith"? Is their faith that superficial and vacuous? Was this a case of individual scriptural ingnorance in the so called Christian Community, Christian leadership failure or a combination of both?
What are your thoughts? Go at it! My opinion will be forthcomng.